all-in

jeez that Sacks v Friedberg pvp on nuclear was the most heated i've ever seen Friedberg

@joeblau what's that app you use to create podcast snippets?

one of the very few times i got frustrated with sacks

Friedberg was technically right, but the failure of many very smart engineers is that they suck at markeing. He’s rattling off technical specs that real life humans don’t care about at all.

His message needs to be: “Electricity will cost $1/yr” not “level 3 reactors don’t melt down”

I use Castro, but Overcast does it as well.

I use Castro, but Overcast does it as well.

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/castro-podcast-player/id1080840241

Whatever your decentralized, borderless, neutral, censorship-resistant open blockchain question is, the answer is YES… to Crypto!

I'm actually on the friedberg side. it's not a scientist thing even. it's engineering. 

1950s cars aren't the same as today's cars. idk why the reactors would be.

Yeah it also seemed like they totally ignored the fact that Friedberg kept talking like these new whiz bang things are safe, and that scientists are NEVER WRONG and what’s the problem with people not wanting experimental untested new technology in their communities?

When have scientists ever been correct on this. There are ALWAYS follow on effects. He’s ignoring them irresponsibly.