Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Bitfloorsghost pfp
Bitfloorsghost
@bitfloorsghost.eth
Three (very simple) things happen and @clanker stays the market leader and goes to 1B 1) enable devs to purchase their own tokens upon deployment - otherwise no one will build a serious project on it 2) creators get the vast majority of fees (90/10) - once again it’s their project, makes no sense to make less than the bot 3) rev share with clanker token holders enabling them to collect on 5% of that 10% of fees
11 replies
3 recasts
54 reactions

Kieran Daniels 🎩 pfp
Kieran Daniels 🎩
@kdaniels.eth
1 is already being built. The other points make sense, but the 60/40 LP split allows them to scale without charging any other fees at any other cliff. I think the 60/40 might be the brilliant secret sauce and lets them have overhead to redistribute if that’s the best move. Otherwise it’s fees at diff cliffs which add up. Proxy has a good head about this I’ve been talking to him
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions

Bitfloorsghost pfp
Bitfloorsghost
@bitfloorsghost.eth
i get it, but you can't pass business operating costs onto customers in this space tbh outside of whats reasonable it's narratives more than it is what the real numbers are
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction