Chu Ka-Cheong pfp
Chu Ka-Cheong
@kc
A quick technical review šŸ§µ on AT Protocol (Bluesky) and Farcaster. Both protocols have quite similar objectives, but they have very different design. First, identity. Both want account portability where user can migrate identity to a new service provider without existing serverā€™s cooperation (unlike Fediverse).
22 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Chu Ka-Cheong pfp
Chu Ka-Cheong
@kc
In ATP, the small-world (i.e. PDS) is user-owned and hence it offers censorship resilience similar to the web. The big-world is provided by larger service providers and it is inevitable that censorship (or moderation) happens in this layer. 12/n
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction