Solana

parcl 
I decided to do my first full analysis of the project. It has been in my mind for a long time and hasn't let go for a long time, but the drop from 0.7 to 0.1 made me think about it. @Parcl

founders of the project 
I will highlight three founders of the project: Jason Lewris, Trevor Bacon, Kellan Grenier. The history of two of them is interesting, they worked in significant companies, if you want to know more, find them on LinkedIn.

But I noticed something strange: Kellan Grenier did not have a significant role in his professions, while Trevor Bacon worked in Microsoft itself. I searched and found: Jason Lewris and Kellan Grenier worked in the same company, hence the question, is he just a talented person

or was he hired through connections, and if it is the second option, then how do you rate a project that hires its acquaintances for a high position? remains a question. But at the same time, the project has a good team and there are not the last people there.

tokenomics distribution of money reflects the literacy of the project representatives, and what I found: from the moment of listing there was no linear unlocking for team representatives, the team preferred to simply suddenly unlock 33% of their allocation in one day

Would you like to play on trust? If so, then congratulations on your first day in cryptocurrency, because people since 2022 understand that counting on honesty is a bad thing. Look at $AEVO, the story is similar there, regarding unlocks, and where did the price fall?

project analysis for the entire period, the trading volume was 5.4B$. This is a very good indicator. I also looked at trading over a period of 1 month and got not modest indicators, the volumes were 150M$. Now let's turn on our ingenuity and look at the project's commission:

project analysis for the entire period, the trading volume was 5.4B$. This is a very good indicator. I also looked at trading over a period of 1 month and got not modest indicators, the volumes were 150M$. Now let's turn on our ingenuity and look at the project's commission: Maker Fee - 0.12%, Taker Fee - 0.15%. Let's say trading was with a commission of 0.12%, then we get that for the entire period the project's revenue is $640 million, are you surprised?

Personally, I am surprised. That is, last month their revenue was $18 million. Not bad overall picture of the project what I liked about this project is that it took on two highly liquid areas: forex and RWA, but in 2024 they closed forex, why? I don't know. I traded this market and I want to say that the terminals there are just terrible, and the parcl platform has an excellent design. You could say that advertising+many forex trading pairs=an influx of liquidity into the project, but they did not develop this industry, it's a shame... follow my twitter to continue reading

(and this is 16% of the entire supply) and only then do vesting, although it was possible to do like $DRIFT, do vesting from moment of listing and not disturb the balance of the token supply. At the moment, the supply is ~28%, almost half will be instantly poured into the market.