Kalman Lajko ∎
@kalman
49 Following
38 Followers
Casts
Casts + replies
Kalman Lajko ∎
@kalman
Why hard against world government? If it is federated enough it does not have to sacrifice the cultural/economic sovereignty of countries. It could probably just stop war + provide a basic set of human rights.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kalman Lajko ∎
@kalman
You should solve the governance problem, i.e. redesign the state for the age of the internet :P . Jokes aside, do you have thoughts (or a post) comparing governance solutions, liquid democracy, quadratic voting, etc?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Kalman Lajko ∎
@kalman
gm
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Kalman Lajko ∎
@kalman
It was quite confusing since you included Starknet in there. It is now Kakarot, so it makes sense 🙏
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kalman Lajko ∎
@kalman
I think anything any construction that has some state and a consensus mechanism is a layer. To be an L2 to you have to follow L1, to be an L3 you have to follow L2. A proof aggregator might or might not have a consensus mechanism, depending on this it will either be a layer or not.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction