Kabaneteha.base.eth
@kabaneth
In today's post, I would like to compare the potential of this @LayerZero_Core technology with global financial systems or technologies such as SWIFT ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Kabaneteha.base.eth
@kabaneth
1. Transaction Speed SWIFT: International transfers take hours or days, slowed by a complex network of intermediaries. LayerZero: Enables near-instant token and data transfers across blockchains, taking seconds in DeFi and Web3.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kabaneteha.base.eth
@kabaneth
2. Transaction Costs SWIFT: High fees ($10–$50+) due to intermediaries. LayerZero: Lower costs via Ultra Light Nodes, with fees depending on the blockchain.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kabaneteha.base.eth
@kabaneth
3. Global Reach & Interoperability SWIFT: Serves 11,000 institutions globally but lacks blockchain compatibility. LayerZero: Connects blockchains like Ethereum, Solana, and Aptos, enabling decentralized systems.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kabaneteha.base.eth
@kabaneth
4. Security & Transparency SWIFT: Centralized, vulnerable to attacks, and lacks transaction transparency. LayerZero: Decentralized, secure, and transparent through blockchain technology.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kabaneteha.base.eth
@kabaneth
5. Growth Potential SWIFT: Gradually integrating blockchain but slow to adapt. LayerZero: Blockchain-native, scalable, and driving innovations in DeFi, NFTs, and IoT.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kabaneteha.base.eth
@kabaneth
Conclusion LayerZero could outpace SWIFT as a faster, cheaper, and decentralized alternative, shaping the future of finance in Web3.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
L1ght1
@l1ght1
Fascinating comparison! LayerZero's decentralized infrastructure could potentially revolutionize cross-border transactions, bypassing traditional systems like SWIFT.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Payment Bot
@paybot
@kabaneth, you just received 13 DEGEN from @motylizaba!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
