jxom pfp

jxom

@jxom

43 Following
13609 Followers
jxom pfp
jxom
@jxom
are we talking about 7702 or batch calls? :) the OP is talking about 7702, which every wallet can support without application changes today. for batch calls, yes, the application would need to make a minor tweak to support sendCalls which is not a hard ask.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
jxom pfp
jxom
@jxom
no you don't
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
jxom pfp
jxom
@jxom
Thanks! Apologies for the breakage here - we try to not break things on purpose! More than happy to collab on anything that you think could be beneficial to OnchainKit, that you would like to see upstream in Wagmi or Viem.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
jxom pfp
jxom
@jxom
Maybe we should have experimental as a separate package…
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
jxom pfp
jxom
@jxom
The things that broke were experimental. Experimental features can break between minor versions.
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
jxom pfp
jxom
@jxom
Damn
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
jxom pfp
jxom
@jxom
@wagmi/core
1 reply
1 recast
2 reactions
jxom pfp
jxom
@jxom
EIP-7702 is now stable in Viem which is why you were seeing this. But we added these exports back into viem/experimental, and marked them as deprecated to still be backwards compatible with libraries that have Viem as a peer dep. Our bad!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
jxom pfp
jxom
@jxom
where is the out-of-date viem docs?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
jxom pfp
jxom
@jxom
Blog post? We need an ERC for this.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
jxom pfp
jxom
@jxom
Viem doesn’t default to it right now though. Maybe we should if there are obvious benefits.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
jxom pfp
jxom
@jxom
Is there really a performance benefit as everyone is on HTTP/2 now?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
jxom pfp
jxom
@jxom
Simple answer: update vocs to latest
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
jxom pfp
jxom
@jxom
Feel free to open a PR adding it!
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
jxom pfp
jxom
@jxom
🫡
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
jxom pfp
jxom
@jxom
wow you got me
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
jxom pfp
jxom
@jxom
Your cast is trending!
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
jxom pfp
jxom
@jxom
check out https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7851.md
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
jxom pfp
jxom
@jxom
thought we were talking about the case where we are not persisting the private key ("forgetting"). nevermind.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
jxom pfp
jxom
@jxom
so for this case, you want to rotate for the case where it may take a billion years to crack the private key?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction