Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Pierre Pauze šŸ”µ šŸš½ pfp
Pierre Pauze šŸ”µ šŸš½
@pierrepauze
How it feel shilling art on Crypto Twitter. /artcoin j will fix it
2 replies
0 recast
7 reactions

J. Valeska šŸ¦ŠšŸŽ©šŸ«‚  pfp
J. Valeska šŸ¦ŠšŸŽ©šŸ«‚
@jvaleska.eth
this is fckn absurd.. torture is not art
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Pierre Pauze šŸ”µ šŸš½ pfp
Pierre Pauze šŸ”µ šŸš½
@pierrepauze
ahah idk what is art or not but regarding torture fortunately or unfortunately, the Art history has already answered this issue https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viennese_Actionism
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

J. Valeska šŸ¦ŠšŸŽ©šŸ«‚  pfp
J. Valeska šŸ¦ŠšŸŽ©šŸ«‚
@jvaleska.eth
I am not pretending to be the judge of art haha but I can recognize torture, degradation and vexation.. if that guy want to be part of a violent art experience, he could try hooking himself and I could try painting his body with a different method, what he is doing is clearly a method of wild torture.. to satisfy his own dark obsessions about viennese actionism is a bit offensive that wikipedia uses the words transgression and subversive.. haha it is more like a regression to nazi's regime.. or probably not even a regression, they just knew their audience.. (I am pretty sure that I will find nazi's parents on at least one of these "artists", wdyt?)
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Pierre Pauze šŸ”µ šŸš½ pfp
Pierre Pauze šŸ”µ šŸš½
@pierrepauze
Art is a dangerous egregore. Nazism began with a frustrated artist. The history of art, like the history of humanity, has its dark side. To be clear: I don't like the Viennese actionists, nor the 60's. And I don't like it when art is used as a pretext for the release of gratuitous or libidinal violence. In the case of the video posted for artcoin, I don't know where it comes from, it looks very contemporary, and in my case it's ironic to post it. Like the expression of an age that no longer knows where to find transcendence in aesthetic.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

J. Valeska šŸ¦ŠšŸŽ©šŸ«‚  pfp
J. Valeska šŸ¦ŠšŸŽ©šŸ«‚
@jvaleska.eth
yeah, yeah, no need explanation :) the history of the humanity is very dark, that's true, this is why violence in art is not a transgression nor it is subversive, art is always leading the change, the revolution.. and there is nothing revolutionary on that.. just regression.. we are supposed to evolve from violence without control to democratic societies with consensus.. chriscocreated cocreations like we are the art are like a representation of this consensus concept, where all the parts being part of the art must agree and contribute to create the artwork (group art is not something new but globally onchain collabs are revolutionary, and may open new ways to explore) about postmodernism.. when everything becomes art, nothing is art.. this makes me think.. that being subversive and revolutionary today could be the opposite.. giving value to everyone's similarities instead differences.. and uniqueness.. or something like that.. not sure.. this may lead to everyone wearing uniforms and a bored world..
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction