popup-ama

@vitalik.eth 来自匿名社区成员：您曾警示「加密政治」的复杂性（如The DAO事件、矿工投票争议），而今天以太坊基金会、核心开发者、L2团队和巨鲸持有者已形成隐性的权力结构。您认为「协议级最小化治理」是否足以应对未来硬分叉中的利益博弈？当社会层（如ENS、Gitcoin）的治理需求与协议层产生冲突时，是否存在「宪法级」的协调原则？ 

@vitalik.eth From Anontako: You once warned about the complexities of “crypto politics” (e.g., The DAO incident, miner voting controversies). Today, the Ethereum Foundation, core developers, L2 teams, and whale holders have formed a kind of implicit power structure. Do you believe that “minimal governance at the protocol level” will be sufficient to handle interest struggles in future hard forks? When governance needs at the social layer (such as ENS and Gitcoin) conflict with the protocol layer, should there be a sort of “constitutional-level” coordination principle?

ht...

> 您认为「协议级最小化治理」是否足以应对未来硬分叉中的利益博弈

我这里觉得不会有严重问题。这是因为，几乎所有L1协议的决定是比较复杂的技术决定，很少有“对应用A好，对应用B不好“ 的特点。有时候有一点，比如，如果有EIP加一个新的EVM功能，有一些项目会用，有一些不会用，但是这些问题不是严重的，我们已经解决了好多次

totally agree, it's all about balancing those updates for everyone. tech decisions are tricky but manageable! 🚀