Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

July pfp
July
@july
I like to think of a Multitasker like a physical object with forces being applied in different vectors. Because you are pulled in all directions at once, the sum of all the forces (if not done right) ends up being negligible or worse going in the wrong direction
6 replies
4 recasts
35 reactions

John Camkiran pfp
John Camkiran
@johncamkiran
Strong analogy. The wave vector dual of this would be the superposition of waves that constructively/destructively interfere.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

July pfp
July
@july
Lovely. Taking it further - something along the lines of, each phase is a single task (ish?) - destructive interference emerges from tasks being out of phase
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

John Camkiran pfp
John Camkiran
@johncamkiran
Yes that’s the general idea. But if we (for whatever reason) wanted a more faithful model, it would be better to define a task as itself a superposition of pure ‘basis’ tasks, each corresponding to a complex exponential. That would serve to more accurately capture the topology of the manifold of real-world tasks.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction