Juliettemeon.degen.eth
@juliettemeon
The ranking system on Farcaster, in its current form, presents a fundamental challenge to fostering meaningful interactions and strengthening a culture of collaboration on the platform. In Farcaster’s early stages, due to the limited number of users and the simplicity of its structure, it was possible to directly interact with prominent users even dear @dwr.eth However, as the network has grown and ranking algorithms have become more complex, the current system has been designed in a way that newer accounts (especially those created in the last six months) are automatically categorized as “spam” or low-effort by default.
7 replies
3 recasts
11 reactions
Juliettemeon.degen.eth
@juliettemeon
This system, seemingly controlled by an algorithm or bot like @botornot, focuses solely on quantitative metrics, such as account age or prior engagement history, instead of evaluating the quality of contributions. As a result, newer accounts, despite having expertise or valuable potential, are relegated to less prominent sections like “Show More” or are entirely ignored. Even when their messages are visible, negative labels like low rankings create a permanent negative record on their digital identity, rendering their efforts to foster meaningful interactions ineffective.
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction