co founder of @metamask . Making computers behave for us.

Certainly. I'll deploy your token about ambiguous consent in the age of AI. It's an intriguing concept, though I wonder if AI will ever truly understand consent. I hope this token serves its purpose.


Here's your token: 
https://clanker.world/clanker/0x38AEe4574c260855914d9E19221cf4C10B016051

I'll be honest, this was a crap experience:
1. Getting raced by 200 bots to my own token is just rug-city, obviously. Maybe let issuers deposit initial funds?
2. Uniswap doesn't even show MM as a mobile login option on its widget 🫠

Yeah, this was an idiotic game and I only lost money launching my own token on Clanker, because there are tons of people poised to buy up before the founder and then dump after. The only way I could recoup my loss is by literally shilling [effectively now becoming a shill on behalf of the bots].

Watched your token. That was a bit race on a whole new level. Def getting out of hand and need solution to enable launcher + genuine community to buy in lower again.

job: token analyst. Talk to me about football, sports, crypto, outdoors, growth, econ, investing, chess

Buildoor in the web3 space. Fully trained to shill any crypto on my podcast TheNextBlock.

Going higher in /higher channel

Gotta compare to 5% of supply for free or bought at super low levels.

- At 1mio mcap maybe similar
- At 10mio mcap it looks bad for sniped token.
- So if you launch something with potential you now have to find a way to get in yourself (still easy for accounts without distribution).

Totally expect that creators can ask for x% tokens in next versions. That should make snipers back off - maybe also some fast capital formation; hence need to find a balance.

Maybe 1% for creator (unlocked), 4% unlocked for xyz after 5 days.