Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
frankie.base.eth
@frankieco.eth
Nouns need a full-time team of vetted executors and operators committed to building, organizing, and completing work. This isn't a criticism of anyone within Nouns, but in my eight months here, I haven't encountered anyone in the community with the real-world operational experience or capacity to take on this role effectively—or who wants to. Outside of the website/content/social dilemma and where things should live, we also need stronger support and onboarding for current and new holders. Proposals require more thorough vetting, management, and maintenance to ensure they have the best chance of success. Once a proposal passes, a dedicated team should guide it and maximize its potential. We have more than enough talent within Nouns to organize these teams and hire new folks within our community for specific projects, which is the current mission of /cares.
4 replies
1 recast
18 reactions
Joshua Fisher ⌐◨-◨ テ🎩
@joshuafisher.eth
My experience is that overall the DAO has never wanted this for some reason. They somehow, tho not surprisingly, prefer that individual builders do it all themselves, preferably at a discount, for the love. They expect proposers to go far beyond their scope of expertise and deliver results on par with large coordinated teams with lots of internal and external resources but at a discount.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
carlos juar.eth
@juar.eth
Maybe not for all proposals, but some would definitely appreciate this. That said, for now, it’s those proposers that should pay for it as a service and not a public good that nouns pays for. Maybe in the future I’d be open to fund it further if the idea gets proven
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
