Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
eric.eth
@eric.eth
How do people feel about the fragmentation of the Ethereum social layer occurring between here and Twitter? It's not ideal that Ethereum is now less represented on Twitter by all the bright minds that have moved here. At the same time, I want to see novel apps like this take off. It's a tough one...
44 replies
7 recasts
67 reactions
Josh Stark
@js
1 reply
0 recast
10 reactions
Josh Stark
@js
translation: Crypto twitter was an important phase for the ecosystem & crypto's emergence into the public sphere, but it isn't the end state, and sometimes climbing to a higher peak means walking downhill for a while.
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
eric.eth
@eric.eth
Odds the non-crypto public moves here are *extremely* low. What's endgame for farcaster? Capture the crypto audience as a whole? We risk just talking to ourselves in an ecochamber Not being critical of farcaster, I think it's great, but just trying to have an honest convo.
4 replies
1 recast
2 reactions
Josh Stark
@js
I don't think it's a bad question. But: (1) I do think we have always over-rated twitter. Yes, it's important to get the ideas, vision, facts, and philosophy of crypto to a wider audience. But the power there is in the content, not a particular network. Crypto twitter is dead, long live Crypto everything-else.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Josh Stark
@js
(2) I do believe that protocol-based social media has a good chance at "winning". That version of the world is one of the reasons I got into Ethereum in the first place! *Showing* the value of blockchains is more important than twitter. People don't have to use Farcaster to be influenced by its success.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
