one core insight of the crypto community is the move to go beyond "what should the rules be?" and additionally ask: "what should the rules be made of?"

I work for Ethereum at the Ethereum Foundation.

Husband, dada, head of product at FastLane Labs. Prev @rainbow

I'm not sure there is one - thoughts:

(1) There's lots written about specific "dimensions" of hardness. How reliable is X cryptography? What are Ethereum's defenses against certain attacks? What should long-term issuance be? Much of ethresear.ch is about narrow pieces that contribute to Ethereum's hardness.

I was about to tweet this earlier but might as well ask it here. What do you think is the latest and best articulation in blog/talk form (based on the current state of the Ethereum roadmap and its known idea mazes) of the “differentiation of Ethereum via hardness.” The sales pitch basically

"What are their rules made of?"

"They're made out of meat."

"Meat?"

"Meat. Their rules are made of meat."