Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
AMA
208 replies
210 recasts
845 reactions

zach roth pfp
zach roth
@zachroth.eth
what is an actual killer consumer use case for onchain that you think will break into the mainstream/normies for REAL, beyond speculation?
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Payments and credentials
1 reply
0 recast
20 reactions

Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
What is the payments use case where crypto has the strongest durable advantage?
4 replies
1 recast
13 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
I'm a big believer in the @balajis.eth barbell idea: crypto is really good for extremely large and small payments. I think extremely large payments are less frequent, so on total volume / people impacted pov, I would imagine frequent, really small payments is more likely to be something that crypto does well. Also bullish on the idea that AI agents will transact in / prefer crypto.
4 replies
1 recast
34 reactions

Haole pfp
Haole
@haole
Base chain transactions cost only a few cents, while most payment SaaS platforms charge a percentage of the transaction amount. There must be a business opportunity for this.
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Challenge is most consumers in developed countries already have card payments and that's a habit. Hard to break.
6 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Joshua Hyde ツ pfp
Joshua Hyde ツ
@jrh3k5.eth
I think, if consumers were presented an option to pay with card with fees or pay with cash/crypto with no fees (or, at worst, a much-smaller crypto payment processor fee), I think the habit could be broken.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

HΞLiX ♻️🧙‍♂️🎩 pfp
HΞLiX ♻️🧙‍♂️🎩
@h3lx.eth
Onboarding is an issue - always has been. It’s too clunky to set up wallets / CEX accounts etc. For many it’s worth paying that card fee to simply avoid the initial steps involved with crypto (not to mention they’d pay similar fees to get money off the cex in the first place).
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction