Varun Srinivasan
@v
Interesting misconception that Dan flagged today - people think that we are (or could be) using LLMs for spam detection. With the way LLMs work today, that's like using a hammer to cut your fingernails. LLMs are slow, expensive and don't really have a deep understanding of what spam is in the context of Farcaster. We use a random-forest decision tree that @akshaan designed, and feed it a bunch of signals using embeddings, user actions and graph data.
15 replies
11 recasts
70 reactions
Jacob
@jrf
a video about this would be very cool interesting content, for sure
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
Stephan
@stephancill
Yes please
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
daivd ๐ฉ๐ฝ โ
@qt
Agreed!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction