jon wong pfp

jon wong

@jnwng

25 Following
286 Followers


jon wong pfp
jon wong
@jnwng
shipped initial specifications and implementations of [Solana Actions](https://solana.com/solutions/actions) + blinks to bring x.com (or any site) onchain think there's an opportunity to either align or extend the existing FC transaction spec to bring that functionality directly into FC clients: https://warpcast.com/jnwng/0x99a462c6 the spec would need to adjust itself given the difference in execution models, but would be seamless to have a one-size-fits-all Frame for Solana Actions /cc @v
1 reply
2 recasts
5 reactions

jon wong pfp
jon wong
@jnwng
definitely. there’s no great solution for this today on Solana
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

jon wong pfp
jon wong
@jnwng
couple of examples attached! wallet pings API for serialized txn, which can be unpacked and simulated the txn request through TipLink.io sees an NFT mint so surfaces that in the preview. things like token transfer are straightforward to detect since there’s a single token smart contract being used
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

jon wong pfp
jon wong
@jnwng
(i forgot about the transaction cost at 0.000005 SOL. can fit 10 mints in there so i’ll give it a generous 5e-7 on cost, which is still $0.00005)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

jon wong pfp
jon wong
@jnwng
dive into my exploration of state compression trees on Dune: dive in: https://dune.com/jnwng/department-of-forestry most interesting insight: there's a roughly equivalent allocation of 0-3, 3-10, and 10+ depth trees out there. folks care about composability!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

jon wong pfp
jon wong
@jnwng
state compression on Solana has absolutely exploded state growth—storage space for 7.43 billion digital assets has already been allocated for just over ◎2,433, putting the price of a digital asset on Solana at ◎0.0000003 ($0.00003) getting onchain doesn't have to be expensive!
1 reply
1 recast
4 reactions

jon wong pfp
jon wong
@jnwng
- when on desktop, expose QR for mobile signing, or Wallet Standard to hit desktop extensions - when on mobile, deeplink might be the only way. WalletConnect isn't broadly adopted on Solana wallets 2/2
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

jon wong pfp
jon wong
@jnwng
initial thoughts on the Solana version of this spec, particularly from the perspective Solana Pay transaction requests: - probably want to enforce CPI Guard / Lighthouse protection instructions - might as well enforce that fees are paid for - verify writeable accounts ... 1/2
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

jon wong pfp
jon wong
@jnwng
landing a transaction directly in the currently processing slot is bliss
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

jon wong pfp
jon wong
@jnwng
haven't had a chance to provide constructive criticism beyond that, but hope to do so in the days to come
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

jon wong pfp
jon wong
@jnwng
the FC tx spec is somewhat incongruent with Solana, but might make sense to diverge the implementation of the transaction spec given different trade-offs—on Solana you can ensure that certain accounts aren't given write permissions, require that txes be gasless, or ensure inclusion of ixes that safeguard user funds
1 reply
1 recast
4 reactions

jon wong pfp
jon wong
@jnwng
in case it is useful, this concept has been battle-tested on Solana—check out [Solana Pay transaction requests](https://docs.solanapay.com/core/transaction-request/overview) in case that provides any useful insight. similar strategy to encode the URL, although given Solana's account model has different params
2 replies
1 recast
7 reactions

jon wong pfp
jon wong
@jnwng
having a Solana-forward client would def be a creative unlock given the signing keys + ease of relayer. add on that Phantom Shortcuts and Solana Pay txn requests and you’ll have rich interactive NFTs right in feed!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

jon wong pfp
jon wong
@jnwng
the real ones know that happened before the recording started :)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

jon wong pfp
jon wong
@jnwng
if you've been curious about what's happening in the /solana ecosystem, join us Thursday, 2/8 at 1pm EST for: - /farcaster w/ @dwr.eth - Crypto x longevity w/ Bryan Johnson (Don't Die!) - DePIN Deep Dive w/ @getgrass - Jupuary Review w/ meow - Launch of the Month check it: https://lu.ma/ecosystem-call-feb
0 reply
3 recasts
7 reactions

jon wong pfp
jon wong
@jnwng
if you've been curious about what's happening in the /solana ecosystem, join us Thursday, 2/8 at 1pm EST for: - /farcaster w/ @dwr.eth - Crypto x longevity w/ Bryan Johnson (Don't Die!) - DePIN Deep Dive w/ @getgrass - Jupuary Review w/ meow - Launch of the Month check it: https://lu.ma/ecosystem-call-feb
0 reply
3 recasts
7 reactions

jon wong pfp
jon wong
@jnwng
battle scars from the 10,000th variation of Sol i’ve heard over my years lol
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

jon wong pfp
jon wong
@jnwng
i’m supportive but we have _got_ to find some better names Starcaster, Starfall, Sundown, Sunchaser… imagine if this protocol was called Ethcaster even Soulcaster sounds way better sub the Hub with generalized state compression, Solana Pay “Shortcuts” ala Phantom for onchain Frame support, gasless relays
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

mert pfp
mert
@0xmert
Helius RPCs maintained 99.99999% (!) uptime while landing up to 4-5x higher % of transactions than the median with lower confirmation times due to our new transaction sending setup — during the largest airdrop in Solana (and maybe crypto) history LFG
1 reply
1 recast
21 reactions

jon wong pfp
jon wong
@jnwng
me, this is about me!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction