Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Sanjay pfp
Sanjay
@sanjay
This one was tricky to track down. There were a lot of dead ends. Special thanks to @wazzymandias.eth for basically fixing it last night and not telling the rest of us ๐Ÿ˜‚ @cassie and @sds for some deep libp2p and tcp tuning magic, which we thankfully didn't need. And finally to my good friend Claude, who pointed me to the `node --prof` command which is able to profile worker threads, would've been much more difficult to narrow down the root cause without it.
10 replies
12 recasts
77 reactions

jj ๐Ÿ›Ÿ pfp
jj ๐Ÿ›Ÿ
@jj
Itโ€™s kinda crazy - Iโ€™m now seeing over 10k+ peers and still going Awesome job team!
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

jj ๐Ÿ›Ÿ pfp
jj ๐Ÿ›Ÿ
@jj
@sanjay just finished a scan and itโ€™s 16k+ peersโ€ฆ
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Sanjay pfp
Sanjay
@sanjay
Thatโ€™s insane. Are you counting unique peer ids? Via getCurrentPeers?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

jj ๐Ÿ›Ÿ pfp
jj ๐Ÿ›Ÿ
@jj
Yes ill upload it again with ip traces
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction