Welcome to @jing, co-founder of @optimism!

She's kindly agreed to do an AMA (starts in 45 minutes).

Reply with your questions. :)

Working on Farcaster and Warpcast. Longer thoughts at https://dwr.email

distributing profits from sequencer fees, in the form of retroactive grants, proportionally among developers who drive txn vol seems fair and reasonable

downside is that it tends to reward teams who already have a strong capital position, and leave out the ones that dont, making the relatively rich even richer. are you happy with the current approach? if so, why? if not, what changes would you like to see?

I am not sure how to solve the "rich get richer problem" quite yet.

But right now, there is SO MUCH extremely low hanging fruit that really anybody can get funded by RPGF. This is true for now, and one day tools/teams will have enough network effects (either of usage or reputation). Right now, the traditional economy solves for this by having VCs whose job it is to identify the "small guy" and take bets. Whether or not that works perfectly is different question, and improvements on that are certainly possible. I'm excited for us to get to a level of maturity to even begin thinking about those problems.