excited to share our launch criteria for @base mainnet - 2/5 of which are already complete. 

safety and security are our top priority so approaching this very meticulously. 

https://base.mirror.xyz/gxOzGCE-9C7cNZBCo4Ubkkxr87L8BcHDfn5HViSdYGg

@base contributor #001; onchain cities w/ OAK & city3

Pragmatism (Security) at OP Labs.
Prev: ConsenSys & Coinbase.

Attribs: Friendly, curious, introverted, mid-witted.
Chans: /eth-security /maurelian /stoicism




Criteria rather than timeline based deployments are the way 👏

products • protocols • responsible gambling 🤹🏻‍♂️ ⓐ 👁️‍🗨️ ethereum validatooor

awesome, let me know if you need testnet gas

Just started testing Base yesterday. Looking forward to learning and playing around some more.

interest in football, ecosystem growth, econ, investing, chess

the number and quality of developers building onchain

What are “specific things” you became more enthusiastic about since you a) started building Base & b) publicly announced launching?

Building pods.media to help you collect conversations.

the first phase of fault proofs, permissionless output proposals, is the immediate next priority after mainnet and we're still tracking towards the roadmap we've articulated here: https://base.mirror.xyz/H_KPwV31M7OJT-THUnU7wYjOF16Sy7aWvaEr5cgHi8I!

I didn’t really expect it, but I’m still a bit disappointed that none of the criteria have to do with Cannon/fraud proof readiness. 

If mainnet launches without fraud proofs, there isn’t much pressure to get Cannon live for another milestone, or to commit to some kind of schedule for it.