Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jem pfp
Jem
@jem
Is there a reason why more projects aren't using the default framework as the base for their smart contracts? https://github.com/fullyallocated/Default Reasons that come to mind: - Devs don't know about it - Devs don't understand the benefits I've been implementing a new protocol from scratch on default (/megastrategy) and it's saved SO much time.
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Lord Dalresin🐝 pfp
Lord Dalresin🐝
@dalresin
Hm.. could you share any usage examples? It is interesting
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

indigo (b/acc) pfp
indigo (b/acc)
@ind-igo
I actually had an upgrade to this called Dagfault here: https://github.com/ind-igo/dagfault Was built due to limitations that we found when working with vanilla default. We ended up not using it for the newest iteration, because we had a need to deal with a factory. its a pretty messy problem once you need to deal with that
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

K pfp
K
@kijijij
I think a lot of people are not building protocol with all hoops and loops making the messaging to users very complicated. If anyone is building something on top of smart contract then they need to validate / validate rather add gov and other features. I hope that helps.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction