venturecapital

Product

Conventional Silicon Valley wisdom biases towards being “early” to markets rather than being “late”, but this isn’t an absolute — it’s a trade-off just like everything else in life

If your product is addressing a market need that isn’t fully there yet (ie. you’re “early”), then the risk taken is around surviving long enough for the market to mature. You can allay this by being lean, achieving ramen profitability, or raising a fat war chest to ride it out

Conversely, if the market is already here (ie. you’re “late”), then you’ll face more competition from other products. You’ll have to battle for customers, and the risk becomes more about sales and speed of execution

Personally, I prefer the former. The stress of a competitive category is exhausting, and I’d rather build a product for a market that shows glimpses of maturity. That way, when the market arrives in full, you will have had time to build a great product experience and can just scoop up customers

Building something new. 🟪 Host: /venturecapital /adventures /theitinerant

I agree but there is so much nuance to the answer and I think he does a good job of framing it. 

It depends:

- who’s money it is (personal vs. investors)

- what category (margins, TAM, etc) 

- expected outcome (moonshot IPO vs sell)

If someone is putting their own money in (or friends/family) and is early, it can be a disaster. With investor capital though, much better to be early.

That’s my opinion.