Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
Content Experiment #4: Live casting my reactions to @cdixon.ethā€™s ā€œRead Write Ownā€ It might take 3 hours or all week, but Iā€™ll cast all my thoughts as I have em. 1st impression: Wonderful cover art and an NFT mint I couldnā€™t get to work on mobile (I guess itā€™s delivering the real crypto experience šŸ™ƒ)
9 replies
6 recasts
46 reactions

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
Also what an incredibly stacked book jacket. These are some heavy hitters fr Which makes me wonderā€¦
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
Who is ā€œRead Write Ownā€ written for? Itā€™s not immediately obvious to me, but there are some hints already. Big Tech is noticeably absent from the jacket, but Big (Disney + Nike) and Tech (Altman + Suleyman + Kelly) are both all in! Mark Cuban as bait for business book readers is also telling.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
Combine this w the veritable art piece of a cover illustration (beach sunrise digitalized painting?? - what a specific vibe) My guess rn is RWO is written for non-independently wealthy, but still-relatively-self-actualized Silicon Valley operators AND anyone that used to tweet a lot from Brooklyn Letā€™s begin šŸ«”
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
god Iā€™m such a sucker for Dyson adjacent content - gg on quote selection this is gonna get some CS undergrads absolutely ripping on random ass MVPs for new social networks
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
Table of Contents is MUCH denser than expected. Not revising my intended audience yet, but i am curious how this ends up playing out. Some corpo-tech books and up just repeating the same thing in a bunch of different ways bc people are just skimming anyways but fingers crossed here itā€™s not!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
TOC pt 2 - itā€™s interesting to note how much actual crypto native vernacular is used. (Not much but he did say NFT which is bold and I appreciate that a lot) Imo this is the right decision for the audience I THINK itā€™s for Farcasters might be less impressed by this bc it might make everything feel dumbed down
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
Introduction - Mostly a specific version of history where Big Tech is obviously the bad guy in this narrative. I think it plays into public perception (and tbh reality) of modern tech well Software as creative expression isnā€™t as effective imo but blockchains as steel vs wood is a GREAT device
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
1. Why Networks Matter Nice little ode to the power of interconnections + math Neat riposte to the reflexive ā€œREGULATE MOREā€ that democratic aides who have to read this to brief their lawmaker on RWO will def think while reading this Also Iā€™m such a sucker for well-curated quotes to complement ideas
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
2. Protocol Networks is nerd bait tech history porn done v well Itā€™s a great journey linking Greek linguistics to techno-hippie developers to centralized name spaces to decentralized take rates to RSS and more. It omits some important specifics but itā€™s ch 2 w a full exploration later! (also omfg THE QUOTES)
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Julien šŸŽ© pfp
Julien šŸŽ©
@jcoulaud.eth
I was exactly on the same page yesterday!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction