links đ´
@links
This is hilarious. People paid 0.01 ETH for an NFT to join a whitelist to mint another NFT for 0.015 ETH. There is no commitment from the dev to build anything. There is nothing you can do with the NFT but trade it. Who is buying shit like this?
13 replies
0 recast
15 reactions
jcdenton.cast
@jc
We didn't sell an NFT for a whitelist, the OG NFT collection started up for FarCraft, a game on FarAgent that evolved into being an OG for FarAgent/"Club Coin". If a collectible had a public roadmap it would no longer be a collectible. https://warpcast.com/jc/0x4210a84a
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions
links đ´
@links
I can only speak from my perspective - and what I saw is a frame for Club Coin telling me to buy an NFT without saying why. Then that same frame says this NFT gets you a whitelist spot to buy another NFT. And that NFT can be burned for ERC20s. Can you see why this looks extractive AF to me? You could say you had another intent, but that intent is not available to me on the frame, website, or channel. SooooâŚdoes that intent really exist? I still donât know.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
jcdenton.cast
@jc
The vast majority of the whitelist addresses were 10K FIDs, and you can now mint publicly - you didn't need a FarAgent OG NFT. FarAgent OG members seem happy, and people still want them for the exclusive discord channel! Are you saying $15 (0.00888 ETH) at the time ($1800 ETH) was too much for discord perks?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
links đ´
@links
I didnât say that. I said minting an NFT to be whitelisted for another NFT that you can burn for ERC20s seems extractive. And Iâm not the only one who felt that way. All this to say you may have good intent, and getting feedback that your intent is not clear in your products is an opportunity to improve. Iâm glad your audience is happy - thatâa all that really matters.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
