javery.eth

@javery

68 Following

255 Followers

javery.eth pfp

I’ll give it a whirl if you need

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

javery.eth pfp

The the protocol has already shipped 🚢 @flaunch

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

javery.eth pfp

The tokens are paired with a wrapped version of ETH which is swapped in/out during swaps through pre/post hooks with Univ4.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

javery.eth pfp

Ah thanks, I was looking more at the sales fee (which is the big long term earner for the creator). 0.5% to the creator 0.2% to Zora 0.3% for referrals… but what about when no referrals? Does that push creator fees to 0.8% or go back to Zora to go to 0.5%?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

javery.eth pfp

> but what if i'm buying content coins from the top creators on the internet and i keep earning fees on additional content they drop? starts getting more interesting. - new content captured as 721, AND as a content coin - 721 represents the content coins fee stream, the holder receives the fees - users require a 721 OR minimum content coin holding (1 billion of one content coin, 1 million of every post etc) to access gated premium content and initial access to buy new content during a launch window. The creator can then earn with their 721s, or even sell the original content stream for supporters to earn as well.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

javery.eth pfp

How would you the represent each new art piece for purchase? I assume they couldn’t also be coins? NFT instead? 721 or 1155?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

javery.eth pfp

Very true. How about using rehypothecation on low risk yields instead? This gives you a protocol that allows for 100% rewards for the creators and an incentive to run the platform too!

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

javery.eth pfp

Legend! Do you know what happens to the other 0.3% when there are no referrals? Does it go back to the creator? Back to Zora? Or something else?

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

javery.eth pfp

Imagine if you had creator coins, but the creator also minted a 721 token on creation, and 100% of the fees for the coins went to the holder of the 721. The creator gets it all, but has the option to also sell their NFT, and the buyer then owns the ongoing revenue of the creator coin.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

javery.eth pfp

Thanks, any docs or code that covers that for sure?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

javery.eth pfp

Look into using @flaunch Zero protocol fees for 100% of them can be split however you want. You also have the option of splitting g some to the toke itself for price protection and automated buy backs.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

javery.eth pfp

How do the fees work on Zora?

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

javery.eth pfp

If only it were launched on a platform the generates 100% of the fees back to the creator 😩

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

javery.eth pfp

I really like these, they also remind me a bit of @xmon.eth back in the day.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

javery.eth pfp

@zora little help?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

javery.eth pfp

Everyone _wants_ base to be Mac, but is it?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

javery.eth pfp

Can someone explain to me how the creator fees work on Zora? I'm looking here https://support.zora.co/en/articles/2509953 and it has two different sets of fees. There's trading on Zora (Trading Rewards), and then trading on Uniswap (Market Rewards). Both list Creator Rewards as 0.5% Does this mean there's a 2% fee on the trades? Or is it you get Trade Rewarsd OR Market Rewards, not both. And what happens to the rewards if there is no create referral or trade referral? Does the 0.3% or 0.25% go to the Creator or to Zora or somewhere else? Sorry, my brain isn't braining today (cc @zora )

2 replies

0 recast

0 reaction

javery.eth pfp

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

javery.eth pfp

I just created $MATCHA on @flaunch protocol! 🚀 https://flaunch.gg/base/coin/0x8aC8b120F0CDfae95CE7d074eDdA11f6246d23bF Login to flaunch with this Farcaster account to claim any fees generated (80% to you, 20% to protect price action and buy back)

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

javery.eth pfp

I don't think it's big deal, aside from any annoyance with trusted domains. Anyone who is confused by the naming will be happy with the change, anyone who doesn't care already "gets it" and won't mind the switch. I still type twitter.com in the browser despite it being quicker to X, but the redirects work fine as will the ones put in place by the team.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction