Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Varun Srinivasan
@v
FIP: Reduce Storage Limits @wazzymandias.eth's proposal is up for review. it reduces the # of casts, links and reactions per storage unit to help hubs scale. https://github.com/farcasterxyz/protocol/discussions/189
46 replies
113 recasts
460 reactions
mvr 🐹
@mvr
Based on the replies, it seems necessary to clarify what 'running out of storage' actually means. It's not critical; it doesn't prevent you from engaging in Farcaster. There will likely still be archiving services available right? All data holds a lot of value... Also looking at the averages why don't we sacrifice other types storage for more reactions?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Samo
@samo.eth
Running out of reactions doesn't mean you'll get less relevant content served to you by the algo?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jarrett
@jarrettr
even if it did wouldn't it just update to show you content that is more aligned to your recent reactions anyways? The oldest stuff gets removed first
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
mvr 🐹
@mvr
Agree. Also it's a warpcast algo, not protocol level, so depending on how it works it could or it could not. It might also just only use one storage worth of data for relevant content analyses
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
