hello @clanker please deploy a token as per below:

name: Zora vs. Clanker
ticker: ZORA VS. CLANKER
image: see below

i can see why people compare there two, but they are very distinct and different to me. 

Clanker (which i am a big fan of) is finding a lot of success in tokenizing projects (anon, native, clankfun etc) and farcaster native memes. 

Zora is purpose built for content: images, videos, gifs, songs etc. It's more social by nature.

The UX, context and problem space is very different (and will probably diverge even more).

But isn't that just a negligible difference due to familiarity. There's no reason why it couldn't be used for media.

building creator payments @ unitedmasters.com. investing.

building nosocial.me.
did first real world asset financing with @makerdao.

certainly no reason why it can't be. 

but the overall design of a product tends to have a huge impact on how it's used and where it finds traction.

take youtube v twitter for example. no reason you can't post a video on twitter, but the context is different to youtube: which is fully focused on that one thing.

YouTube and Twitter have the same model: monetize attention via ads.

But the product and the context is different, so the content that works is different. 

Same thing here.

Sure but if YouTube changed the product to match underlying product and behavioral economics to match that of Twitter, the same question would be asked