jacob
@jacob
The more prediction markets are seen as a source of truth for elections the greater the incentive to put campaign spending towards it. In a way itβs a pure form of war of attrition.
6 replies
16 recasts
88 reactions
alex π©
@proxystudio.eth
yes, plus there are all manner of groups, entities and individuals with institutional or personal interests and mandates to spend on influencing political outcomes "skin in the game" means different things depending on access to capital we'll see more of this, and will be fascinating to watch how the markets themselves react to narratives & any evidence it is happening
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
tani
@tanishq
Something something goodhartβs law something something
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
netop://γ¦γ¨γ
@netopwibby.eth
It's always been pay for play in politics. Retail "investors" get to join (lose) in the fun now too.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Eddie559βπ§π€πππ±
@eljuniordiaz.eth
What happens if they decide that we will be the way to fund their next War by taxing the shit out of us !!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Vitalii π©
@vitaliidolniy
ππ»
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
BixbySnyder.base.eth π΅π©
@bixbysnyder.eth
You read my mind. Nothing to stop these markets from being manipulated with all the billionaires behind the evil Dems. Votes on the blockchain are the only way of guaranteeing a free and fair election.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Grace Ville π©βοΈπ
@graceville
You're right @jacob It's just a way to try to wear down the enemy to the point of defeat by continuously attacking their forces, logistics and equipment until they become exhausted and cannot continue.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Angelπ₯
@angel112.eth
Interesting π€ but don't you think campaigns overemphasize prediction markets at the expense of grassroots engagement?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction