jacob
@jacob
The more prediction markets are seen as a source of truth for elections the greater the incentive to put campaign spending towards it. In a way it’s a pure form of war of attrition.
6 replies
27 recasts
147 reactions
proxy
@proxystudio.eth
yes, plus there are all manner of groups, entities and individuals with institutional or personal interests and mandates to spend on influencing political outcomes "skin in the game" means different things depending on access to capital we'll see more of this, and will be fascinating to watch how the markets themselves react to narratives & any evidence it is happening
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
tani
@tani.eth
Something something goodhart’s law something something
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
netop://ウエハ
@netopwibby.eth
It's always been pay for play in politics. Retail "investors" get to join (lose) in the fun now too.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Chivito559↑➕🎧📖🍦🍜
@eljuniordiaz.eth
What happens if they decide that we will be the way to fund their next War by taxing the shit out of us !!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
BixbySnyder.base.eth 🔵🎩
@bixbysnyder.eth
You read my mind. Nothing to stop these markets from being manipulated with all the billionaires behind the evil Dems. Votes on the blockchain are the only way of guaranteeing a free and fair election.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Angel🥀
@angel112.eth
Interesting 🤔 but don't you think campaigns overemphasize prediction markets at the expense of grassroots engagement?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
