Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jacek.degen.eth 🎩 pfp
Jacek.degen.eth 🎩
@jacek
We’re not banning anyone just yet, but we want quality posts to get tips. AI-generated content, t4t games, and low-quality posts that extract value from the community aren’t what we support. We reserve the right to moderate posts.
39 replies
4 recasts
152 reactions

Push 🎩🤌🏻 pfp
Push 🎩🤌🏻
@push-
Ok brother, why are you telling us “something” but you’re really just circling around and actually told us nothing? I mean, take your time, but give us something solid to belive again.
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions

Jacek.degen.eth 🎩 pfp
Jacek.degen.eth 🎩
@jacek
We’re considering introducing post moderators to disqualify tips on certain posts. It’s subjective and up to us, but we think it’ll help maintain quality. More details to come!
7 replies
0 recast
8 reactions

baubergo pfp
baubergo
@baubergo-
There was something that really worked well in the past that doesn't have the judgment of people and is more automated, its name is @openrank / @airstack.eth
3 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

Jacek.degen.eth 🎩 pfp
Jacek.degen.eth 🎩
@jacek
OpenRank is a key part of the puzzle, but content moderation is essential too. Even high-ranked members can abuse the system. Balancing automation with moderation ensures fairness and integrity in our community.
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions

Push 🎩🤌🏻 pfp
Push 🎩🤌🏻
@push-
If I feel this. But a fat fact check: I haven’t seen this many doubts, skepticism & complains in the past season. Community is kinda not aligned in szn 6
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

baubergo pfp
baubergo
@baubergo-
If high-ranked members start abusing the system, others will stop interacting with them, and they will start losing their ranks (like what already happened with engagement farmers during the 1-month period we used it). The beauty of this system lies in its self-regulation by the community.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction