Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
gmeow🎩
@j-m
reply guys, what do you think? are we going to be like Loot?
9 replies
0 recast
8 reactions
gmeow🎩
@j-m
i don't know anything but if we are looking at daily active users, that is close to a local top, so who is the marginal buyer?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
gmeow🎩
@j-m
wonder what cobie thinks
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
VeggieChicken🎩
@veggie
i think there’s much more flexibility here than with loot (text description of a buncha rpg gear!), but still need to have some out of the ballpark use cases that’ll make the casual users want to stay.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
LCs
@dex90s
Likely but since user aren't milked up here + we are bot/spam/scam free + the app isn't laggy, I think a good bunch of ct will stay here 😉
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
two3oh2 🎩
@2302
this website is agnostic enough from crypto’s price ups-and-downs that i see it being stickier than a project like Loot where price was innately tied to the discussion fundamentals
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
yeehah
@yeehahboogie
nah I think this will hang around. we need our own crypto socials.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
three9s
@three9s.eth
The biggest difference between Farcaster and the protocols before it is interop and devX. For example, Loot fell off because nobody ever built anything cool with it. Meanwhile, Farcaster has Frames which is super easy to get into and start playing around with, and even multiple people working on clients (soon /nouns)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
p0ppi 🎩
@p0ppi
As long as we don’t end up being bloot!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Alex🎩🪄🩸🔵
@consumes.eth
Farcaster protocol is here to stay, I feel like mainstream adoption is far away but adopting (and also staying) CT is very possible.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
