harsh pfp
harsh
@harsh
100 USDC for running your .sol files through our new tool (swarm.0xmacro.com) to find vulnerabilities, and classify which ones were accurate and which were false positives / irrelevant. @bountybot
13 replies
0 recast
6 reactions

ivyroot pfp
ivyroot
@ivyroot
I ran a WIP version of a game with a minting component through it just now and got 3 medium, 10 low, 33 code quality, and 21 gas optimizations. M-01: centralization by using ownable. Would love to know an alternate suggestion for this. M-02: user excess funds not refunded. Great point, didn't think of that...
4 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

ivyroot pfp
ivyroot
@ivyroot
L-05: missing check for address 0. I think this is medium, great catch. L-06: Loss of precision on division. Not sure what this means beyond the obvious. L-07: consider using ownable 2 step. Aha! news to me.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction