harsh pfp
harsh
@harsh
100 USDC for running your .sol files through our new tool (swarm.0xmacro.com) to find vulnerabilities, and classify which ones were accurate and which were false positives / irrelevant. @bountybot
11 replies
0 recast
6 reactions

Ivyroot pfp
Ivyroot
@ivyroot
I ran a WIP version of a game with a minting component through it just now and got 3 medium, 10 low, 33 code quality, and 21 gas optimizations. M-01: centralization by using ownable. Would love to know an alternate suggestion for this. M-02: user excess funds not refunded. Great point, didn't think of that...
4 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Ivyroot pfp
Ivyroot
@ivyroot
M-03: transfer/send may fail in some scenarios. Great callout but i was aware of that and one is to a known contract and the other is in a withdraw method so i think a false positive. L-01: Missing limits when setting min/max amounts. 4 occurrences reported but only 1 is a max or min so 75% false positive.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction