Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ITU Blockchain
@itublockchain
Hello everyone, Today we’ll review the details of the two proposals we voted on: Rolling Mission Requests and Rolling Mission Requests: Voting Cycle 27. 👇🏼
1 reply
3 recasts
10 reactions
ITU Blockchain
@itublockchain
[1/3] 🧐 In the Rolling Mission Requests proposal, there was a question about whether the unallocated tokens in the Token House under the Intent 3A budget should be reused for funding. We voted in favor of this proposal, believing it supports OP governance and encourages the use of new projects.
1 reply
0 recast
9 reactions
ITU Blockchain
@itublockchain
[2/3] ⛓️ In the Rolling Mission Requests: Voting Cycle 27 proposal, we were asked which projects we want to fund. From our perspective, the two most important aspects in the Superchain and Optimism ecosystem are interoperability and the secure connection of projects linked to the Superchain.
1 reply
0 recast
8 reactions
ITU Blockchain
@itublockchain
[3/3] 🌟 Therefore, we supported the following requests: •Request 1: Subsidized Audit Grants V2 •Request 2: Experimentation of Infrastructure Subsidies •Request 3: Superchain Borrow/Lend Aggregator •Request 6: Decentralized Solvers and Aggregators on OP Mainnet / Superchain
1 reply
0 recast
8 reactions
ITU Blockchain
@itublockchain
✍🏼 Brought to you by @emkey
0 reply
0 recast
9 reactions
