Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/midwits
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

basil pfp
basil
@itsbasil
defi summer was the embryonic stage; innovation flourished: ideas were abundant, infrastructure lagged behind & regulation did not exist now infrastructure has improved & crypto has entered the scaling stage ideas are no longer abundant; emergence has slowed: most of the competition today is recycled & retried ideas, simply now at-scale this has led to a decline in innovation (ie. low differentiation) but an increase in competition alongside better regulation, which has ushered in an era of fragmentation this is what we are currently seeing as the market is captured, maturity is realized, fees are reduced & regulation stabilizes; we will enter an era of consolidation this is on the horizon once growth largely becomes m&a driven, there is little room for new ideas & ai will predominantly drive emerging solutions this means, today, at the token level, if you want to future-proof your project, you must front run consolidation this is best accomplished with a locked flywheel at the network level
3 replies
1 recast
18 reactions

basil pfp
basil
@itsbasil
if everything becomes a token, then what jesse is saying here is correct—we all lose money or put another way, none of us make money as attention & liquidity will become increasingly fragmented & asset appreciation will become few & far between so again, the only way to combat this, is to front run consolidation at the network level which is best done through a flywheel in this scenario, this would mean zora would have to step in & create a new tokenized system at the network level, which would effectively protect their creators downstream from consolidation & derisk the system as a whole if they don’t, they will get gobbled up as the industry matures & consolidates, which would ultimately strip their creators of any potential earning power via whale games & price competition in other words, growth will come to a halt & all earnings will be funneled to the top, leaving their downstream stakeholders caught disengaged & restricted to losses as the expense of a few this applies to all of us
2 replies
0 recast
12 reactions

ionspired pfp
ionspired
@ionspired
no no no it means once everything is tokenized the market will become fair, i.e. everyone will have equal access it does mean higher competition, which is good it does mean lazy ones benefit less
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

basil pfp
basil
@itsbasil
everyone has equal access right now & the market is already “fair” yet 98% of participants have only lost this will accelerate in a everything-is-tokenized world & destroy any network barriers we have that currently protect our users & creators it will not do anything to make the market more efficient or fair; it will dilute everyone & their efforts it will end in hostile consolidation where a handful of big players dominate the small
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

ionspired pfp
ionspired
@ionspired
technically speaking everyone has equal access will be when (i) everyone is physically able to click buy a token (ii) all possible information about a given token is equally accessible (as well as knowledge which allows to fully understand that information) (iii) and everyone possess equal amount of capital and time for trading. roughly this and practically impossible, but it theoretically demonstrates the difference between fair terms (skill-dependent but basically invested time as key factor other than capital) and unfair terms caused by exclusive access to one or multiple of mentioned resources (can be summarized as exclusive knowledge ultimately other than accumulated capital). as i said fair market is theoretical maximum. reality is always unfair to certain extent. so Jesse basically means in general this would make the market more decentralized and by nature fair. you, being more specific to the current issues as you see them, are saying i think that we should preserve certain level of centralization
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction