Sarah Friend
@isthisanart
questions for and about decentralized alternatives to big tech originally wrote this in early 2024 for a book chapter but publication has been indefinitely stalled, so dropping it on the blog https://blog.isthisa.com/decentralization-and-its-discontents/
2 replies
4 recasts
14 reactions
shazow
@shazow.eth
you might enjoy my failed attempt at defining decentralization in 2021: https://shazow.net/posts/decentralization/ i decided it's best to simply not use that word anymore at all, and talk about specific failure modes instead: https://shazow.net/posts/open-social-2025/
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Sarah Friend
@isthisanart
ah these are both great. I'll be teaching an intro to decentralized social in a few months, and I might include your post on this in the readings, if all good w you. I've been in agreement that the word "decentralization" is almost meaningless, at least without further explanations, for some time ... but I still find myself encountering it regularly in the wild (as in this upcoming curriculum "Dweb for creators" lol)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
shazow
@shazow.eth
absolutely! i've found that everyone has their own meaning of the word, and for most people it's some version of "does this have central vibes?" which is supremely misleading. could have a "central" actor who is fully constrained and safe, or a bunch of participants who don't "feel" central but actually each compound failure modes. a better framing I've found is talking about "quality of trust", we can have low quality or high quality trust. math is high quality, an 8ball is low quality. trust is heavily dependent on context, too: a person i trust fully can still betray me if there's a gun to their head, whereas math doesn't care unless there's a bug or incorrect assumption. related older post I'm considering rewriting: https://shazow.net/posts/trustless/
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
