Jason Goldberg ā“‚ļø šŸ’œ pfp
Jason Goldberg ā“‚ļø šŸ’œ
@betashop.eth
Who's your Onchain Graph? Introducing Airstack Onchain Graph ā™¼ analyzes all your onchain interactions and constructs your onchain graph dev APIs to build this into any app for recommendations, solving cold-starts, and more Give it a try at https://explorer.airstack.xyz
17 replies
19 recasts
36 reactions

David Furlong pfp
David Furlong
@df
any reason you didn't go for name.farcaster or name.fname as a better convention for referencing farcaster usernames from outside farcaster?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jason Goldberg ā“‚ļø šŸ’œ pfp
Jason Goldberg ā“‚ļø šŸ’œ
@betashop.eth
Yeah, will look at improving that Thanks!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

David Furlong pfp
David Furlong
@df
I'm curious - I'm not sure what the convention is
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Ignas Peciura ā“‚ļø pfp
Ignas Peciura ā“‚ļø
@ipeciura.eth
I don't think there's a convention. We have decided to use a short version of the protocol name followed by the parameter queried. We have fc_id for Farcaster, and similarly lens_id for Lens. There's no specific reason, just our internal decision after thinking of way how to support multiple protocols.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Ignas Peciura ā“‚ļø pfp
Ignas Peciura ā“‚ļø
@ipeciura.eth
This is also not designed to be a consumer app rather a showcase for the APIs. I wouldn't expect an app building on top of our APIs requesting the end user to enter fc_fname šŸ˜…
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction