booot

I am designing a trading agent on booot, but I am having doubts. 
Does a pure text-based interface really provide good UX? 
I personally prefer AI that can recognize my intention and show me the related UI widgets in the chat window for me to click. Or if it is fully automated, for small amounts, it can auto-trade, but for large amounts, there should be a pending approval queue that allows me to confirm the transactions.

This is slate instructions.

I am designing a trading agent on booot, but I am having doubts. 
Does a pure text-based interface really provide good UX? 
I personally prefer AI that can recognize my intention and show me the related UI widgets in the chat window for me to click. Or if it is fully automated, for small amounts, it can auto-trade, but for large amounts, there should be a pending approval queue that allows me to confirm the transactions.

This is slate instructions.
https://docs.slate.ceo/execution/prompting-guide

🙌🏼 good question. probably no one will answer as wasn’t able to practice enough yet. 

personally I care for trading agent in the sense it will be trading for itself (or both) leaning to full autonomy

in that relation I am to give an interesting suggestion

yea, but thats the fastest way for us to figure out bug/security issues, we shouldn't go with large funds. which btw is imminent sooner or later with agents trading by commands for a user. in that case for a mistake to happen it might be less probability, but the volume of funds provides higher exposure to risk

There are many caveats in autonomous agents.
What if the LLM gives the executor a wrong trading amount? We need careful guard mechanisms.
Platform must whitelist tradable tokens, though this will reduce flexibility.