As of yesterday, the Trump/Vance ticket had the crypto vote locked up. 

As of today, with President Biden's decision to step aside, the Democrats have a fresh chance to leave the anti-crypto army behind and win back a significant share of the crypto vote.

It all comes down to the new nominee. Here are some thoughts on why and how that person (cough, Kamala) can and should turn it around:

As of yesterday, the Trump/Vance ticket had the crypto vote locked up. 

As of today, with President Biden's decision to step aside, the Democrats have a fresh chance to leave the anti-crypto army behind and win back a significant share of the crypto vote.

It all comes down to the new nominee. Here are some thoughts on why and how that person (cough, Kamala) can and should turn it around:
https://paragraph.xyz/@jchervinsky.eth/biden-gives-democrats-a-chance-for-a-crypto-reset

I’ve said it once before and I’ll say it again.

The fact a politician being Pro-Crypto should NOT be your reason to vote for them. Look into their policies, actually inform yourself about their views and what they stand for.

Do'er of things, sometimes artist | Support wizard @ /zora | Handler of @botto | Owner of a Farcaster tatoo

I respect that view from a normative perspective, and it probably reflects the vast majority of people in crypto, who aren't "single-issue voters" for crypto policy.

But from a descriptive perspective, it appears thousands of voters in swing states *are* single-issue voters whom the Democratic Party should pursue.

I agree and I also think it’s a big plus for the politician than endorses crypto because crypto represents a more free market view. Being able to self-custody puts power back on the hand of the people!