Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
ilemi
@ilemi
I think the dichotomy that strikes me most is the volume of difference between twitter and farcaster. On twitter, you have a large following if you have more than 10-20k followers. And a tweet does âwellâ to get like 50+ likes. Here, you have most of your feed covered with people that have 100-200k+ followers, which is just unfathomable given the size we know CT is. And every cast from them automatically gets like 100 likes right away. Those who have been here longer know 80% of those are just bots, imo we have more of an unfiltered bot on stats problem than any autofollow/reach problem. But people new here will complain its a reach problem because of the magnitude of difference. And people psychologically hate seeing that big of a difference. So if I asked the warpcast team for anything, it would be better bot filtering on all shown stats.
8 replies
2 recasts
67 reactions
not parzival
@shoni.eth
counting power badge reactions is a solid proxy
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ilemi
@ilemi
Agree! But need this to be obvious at an app level by warpcast and other clients. Cant be something only us data nerds reason about đ
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
not parzival
@shoni.eth
hmm I agree its frustrating but don't know I agree it makes a better app experience to add a second count vs knowing people who liked it personally I think im in favor of simply removing obvious bots from counts and follows as we go, like twitter but slower and more obvious here. I know tpot has bots because I botted them pre elon On a rant- the content and direct connections matter most and our counts are all skewed together
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction