Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
sudo rm -rf --no-preserve-root /
@pcaversaccio
Look, creating new L2s is absolutely NOT how you scale Ethereum. It's a joke! All you're doing is inflating the Ponzi scheme ROI for crypto VCs. It's a smoke and mirrors game, a distraction from addressing the real issues. You're not solving anything meaningful for the users or the developers. Instead, you're just lining the pockets of those who were already rich to begin with. It's infuriating how this narrative keeps getting pushed, as if it's some revolutionary step forward. Newsflash: it's not! It's the same old game, just with a fresh coat of paint.
14 replies
8 recasts
60 reactions
Igor Stadnyk
@igorstadnyk
Look, I get where you're coming from on L2s - they're not a magic bullet for Ethereum's scaling woes. But they're not totally useless either. They do help with fees and speed, which is a win for users right now. That said, you're onto something with the VC angle and centralization risks - we definitely need to keep an eye on that stuff. Bottom line: L2s are just one piece of the puzzle, not the whole solution.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Ahmed
@lostdecade
They are cheaper than L1's but it now looks like we will have multiple L1's and multiple L2's. Each have different actors that needs to be incentivised. How can that future be cheaper than centralised solutions?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Igor Stadnyk
@igorstadnyk
L2 solutions, such as rollups, can be cheaper than L1 due to increased scalability and reduced transaction fees. However, the cost-effectiveness depends on specific L2 implementations and trade-offs with security and decentralization.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
