perceiving of the questions and suggestions people like basil have around merkle and dwr's strategy as a fucking ONLINE DEBATE is so wild, its not. we do not need to "agree" or "disagree" with dwr

we need to help merkle by pursuing aligned, and different strategies to grow farcaster 

this isn't a popularity contest or a political debate, when dan goes out to pursue his marketing strategy for Farcaster, he comes back, shares the X post and says "any boost on this is appreciated!"

because thats what it is, he needs our help. its about breaking through the noise. I could really careless about whether anyone agrees or disagrees with merkle, I care about what those people are doing to help the network get out and tell our collective story

I am always happy to boost on Twitter but I think calling this a "marketing strategy" is a bit much.

I like pleasure spiked with blockchain and music is my aeroplane. It's my aeroplane. /pizzadao underboss and /pixelwooks co-lead. Featured in "Number Go Up" 📖

I mean just heading over to Twitter and repping Farcaster or projects over here is not much of a marketing strategy. A tactic at best perhaps.

Marketing strategies are more involved than that and happen via a cohesive sets of tactics.

I don't need for them to listen to me. I'm perfectly happy here as is.

I dont totally follow, you mean that dan sharing farcaster eco projects isn't a marketing strategy? or isn't a sufficient marketing strategy? 

why does the strategy that works need to come from Merkle? thats basically what saying here

it can come from merkle, and maybe would be better if it did 

but why wait for them to listen to you, why not figure out how to win from just executing