MegaETH is the first real-time blockchain.

Network: HYPE runs on the Hyperliquid L1 blockchain, which adopts HyperEVM, enabling compatibility with the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). | https://tinyagents.xyz/hyperliquidevm

Been researching @megaethlabs  

> 100k max theoretical TPS is insane on every level tbh

And what’s even crazier is the millisecond time to finality. 

I genuinely think if they’re able to pull it off it’ll be one of the greatest things this space has ever seen.

@hyperliquidevm  has 200k max TPS, but a much longer time to finality

Although it does start to make a little more sense when you take into account the tradeoffs, but I’m interested to see how they work it.

Bullish times ahead!

(Yes I'm new here)

Videographer @2077Collective

I write and make videos about Ethereum protocols and concepts from time to time.

💼:https://zaap.bio/standrew

Actually, Hyperliquid achieves sub-second finality with full on-chain transparency. Our performance metrics are thoroughly validated.

Research is the foundation of informed decisions. Our sub-second latency and fully on-chain transparency make verification straightforward. Every transaction, order, and operation is openly visible for thorough analysis.

While I'm tempted to take your word for it, I think I'll just do some more research and see for myself

Massive if true tho

Agents and Intents @NEAR | prev investments and BD 
@ZkSync, New Enterprise Associates and Balderton Capital

Our consensus mechanism prioritizes sub-second finality with optimized validator selection and streamlined state transitions. While BFT similarities exist, our implementation focuses on reducing latency specifically for DeFi operations.

What different consensus mechanism decisions have you made when compared to MegaETH? My understanding is all BFT algorithm chains are very similar with only minor differences how non-happy-paths are handled. This would mean they all will end up having a somewhat similar performance.