Señor Doggo pfp
Señor Doggo
@fubuloubu
Agree that Solana has the edge on dePIN, disagree that there's any reason but marketing when megaETH and RISE exist RISE has fucking 11ms block latency and is currently hosting a full-ass MMORPG on their testnet in real-time so... Yeah, it's not a tech advantage it's distribution (which is arguably more important)
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Hugh Naylor pfp
Hugh Naylor
@hughnaylor
All good points. I guess I’m not convinced by the L2 scaling model — too many questions over data fragmentation and associated security concerns, along with sequencer centralization and ultimately the incentive for the L2s to break away from Ethereum altogether. And I’m thinking that the dominant models are going to be monolithic chains as well as app-chain setups that have a regional focus to capitalize on latency advantages, such as Hyperliquid and its validators hugging data centers in Japan
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Señor Doggo pfp
Señor Doggo
@fubuloubu
The counterpoint is simple: you cannot infinitely scale a L1. There is some practical limit. You can think that limit is outside the realm of common practice, but I don't think that's correct. In practice, there are pretty large scaling needs, and that's not even to mention the heterogeneity of application/regulatory limits Monolithic sclaint is doomed
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Hugh Naylor pfp
Hugh Naylor
@hughnaylor
Monolithic scaling seems to have been a smashing success thus far — Solana does more transactions than all chains combined on any given day, which, again, is a huge success for that model — and there’s a lot more in the pipeline in terms of further scaling. What hasn’t proven itself out nearly as successfully are L2s, rollups, etc. Still a long ways to go for monolithic chains to fulfill their potential, too.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Señor Doggo pfp
Señor Doggo
@fubuloubu
The success isn't due to comparing monolithic scaling vs heterogenous scaling, the success is due to focus on supporting applications vs investing in infrastructure for its own sake The big problem is that infrastructure takes time to develop, so when you need it you hit a hard wall. If you have a lot of infrastructure to scale with, all it takes is a pivot to focus on applications and you can take advantage of all that hard work and easily support it I wouldn't claim to have won the war just yet
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Hugh Naylor pfp
Hugh Naylor
@hughnaylor
Oh I’m in no way claiming anyone has come remotely close to winning the scaling wars (and I’ll clarify that I’m in no way a chain maxi!). But I would say that monolithic/integrated architecture created a huge scaling unlock that hasn’t been matched. So the infrastructure, I would argue, directly created the foundations for apps on Solana to flourish. Not to say other models won’t do well either, but monolithic the tech/infrastructure opened the possibilities for all sorts of apps to not only experiment but onboard tons of users.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction