Let’s talk about a project that builds liquidity right into its infrastructure.

That’s what Injective is aiming for and here’s how it plays out in practice 🧵 https://t.co/JXWCJkD68G

1/8 Injective isn't trying to be everything for everyone. 

They're building for a specific niche, and judging by their metrics, doing it well: pro traders, derivatives, financial infra.

2/8 What we saw when we looked into Injective is that this isn’t another general-purpose L1.

5/8 From what we’ve seen, Injective seems more focused on giving devs actual building blocks:
– Real capital access
– Modular infra
– Custom execution environments
– Liquidity baked in

6/8 If you're building financial apps, Injective might be the only L1 where everything’s already set up:

As we see it: markets, toolkits, bridges, governance, all part of the base layer and tools that get out of your way.

7/8 We’re keeping an eye on Injective, because it’s practical. 

 As the team puts it: "Every Injective app inherits liquidity and infra out of the box.

"It’s not just infrastructure that comes with liquidity, it’s designed to deliver it."

That changes things: projects ship faster, with meaningful depth behind them.

8/8 We’ll be watching how this evolves, especially as more apps start to build on top of it.

If liquidity really is infrastructural, Injective could be a case worth studying.

Injective is structured like a financial backbone:
– plug-and-play modules
– embedded institutional liquidity
– EVM + WASM compatibility

3/8 Their core idea: infra should turn directly into liquidity.

So, you don’t start from zero, you get working tools and access to users.

Even AI agents can trade on-chain via Injective’s SDK.

4/8 Each part of the stack is designed for speed, scale, and customization.

It’s not about appearances, it’s about building things that actually run.