Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
horsefacts
@horsefacts.eth
Thanks to everyone for input on Frames features last week! We are working on expanding "mint with Warps" to a more general "pay with Warps" that will support more transaction types. π Below are a couple follow up questions that will help us prioritize.
3 replies
2 recasts
29 reactions
horsefacts
@horsefacts.eth
To use "Pay with Warps," your contract must support some kind of "unauthenticated delegation," i.e. not depend on msg.sender. Examples: - An NFT contract with a mintTo function - An airdrop claim with a claimFor function - A dex swap that accepts a to address https://www.weponder.io/farcaster/surveys/584
3 replies
1 recast
9 reactions
horsefacts
@horsefacts.eth
If your contract doesn't support this today, could/would you change it? In some cases, you can use a router contract or multicall to support this use case without directly changing your contracts. https://www.weponder.io/farcaster/surveys/586
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Ben Adamsky π
@ba
Would love to add this to our survey bounty contract (we transferFrom ERC20s) so next time you spin up a survey you can offer a warp bounty π
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
ciefa π eth/acc
@ciefa.eth
cc @eggman.eth
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction