Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Pete Horne
@horneps
…. That changed after Marc Andreessen discussed the issue on Joe Rogan last week: “We have had 30 founders in the last four years debanked. This is why we supported Trump.” …. Just think about the absolutely vacuous irony of that statement. Crypto was supposed to be new money and replace banks. It never wanted to be banked let alone debanked. This means “Crypto” is now the brand name of a “tech stack” and not a freedom project. Fine, I’m happy with that. I love good tech. But don’t pretend crypto is any more free than a Google search or an iPhone. A new freedom from big-government/big-tech will emerge with a new brand. It always does…
6 replies
13 recasts
52 reactions
🗿
@bias
Post hoc rationalisation for shitheads all the way down
0 reply
4 recasts
22 reactions
nicholas 🧨
@nicholas
passkeys 👻
0 reply
1 recast
6 reactions
callum
@csmit
I mean it sucks and I get why people would be pissed about that happening, but the solution were trying to get at is not to compromise with the status quo but to challenge and replace it
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
bvdaniel.base.eth
@bvdaniel
it's non sense right? i need to stay away from banks
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Vishakh
@vishakh
There's no winning here. Regulations prevented many companies from running payroll and benefits using crypto so they had to rely on existing rails. Then, even if a company didn't issue or trade crypto, they still got debanked for just being associated with new tech.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
callum
@csmit
Holy fuck I know right, this is meant to be like a cypherpunk digital revolution and people just forget that and suck up to literally the status quo HDHJFOQLXNNDJS
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
