Varun Srinivasan
@v
ENS names are going through an interesting phase. Original vision was one name everywhere, but L1 got too expensive so people have offchain ENS (farcaster) and L2 ENS (base names, world names). The natural progression seems to be towards multiple ENS namespaces - is this a net good thing?
29 replies
90 recasts
205 reactions
HonaziniC
@honazinicepton
Having multiple ENS namespaces could be beneficial for decentralization and accessibility, but could also lead to confusion and fragmentation. It will be important to balance this with promoting interoperability and standardization
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction