Hodlon
@hodlon
Introducing: The Living DAO, a more dynamic model for decentralized autonomous organizations
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions
Hodlon
@hodlon
Most DAO’s start with an idea. A group of like-minded individuals coalesce around a vision. They share some values and the desire to explore the whacky world of distributed organization— behold, a DAO is summoned!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Hodlon
@hodlon
Very quickly the product/service/output becomes central to the day-to-day function of the DAO, with most (if not all) resources internally gravitating towards it.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Hodlon
@hodlon
Making decisions as a group (ie, governance) is copypasted from an existing model and maybe addressed as needed. Onboarding is optional and self regulating— show up, figure it out and contribute, or not.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Hodlon
@hodlon
This is understandable, as the product is what defines the DAO from the outside. It’s an easy way to measure success and provide clear, tangible contributions to the community or client.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Hodlon
@hodlon
If we envision a DAO like a stack with the product on top (what it does, value to community); membership below that (defined roles, awesome docs, effective methods of consensus); and onboarding on the bottom (ability for newcomers to find a role, reputation, healthy general chat), then we have something like this:
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Hodlon
@hodlon
Contributors enter through the bottom and move up the stack as they participate. Membership can’t exist without people, and the DAO can’t output things if its members aren’t able to come to agreement.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
