0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
9 replies
7 recasts
25 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Coming back to this with a personal opinion; if it offends anyone, please let me know.
CC @kompreni @niftytime.eth
I feel like this functionality (staking before a user is accepted on a job) promotes "insider info" inasmuch as:
1) for long term jobs there can be only one chosen candidate from a pool of usually 10+ users and aside from each candidate's bio, there will be almost no public clues about who might get the job. Therefore, the chances of staking on the right user are slim, and it will be costly.
2) There is, indeed, a higher chance for successfully staking on a user prior to them being accepted on a job, and that's only on small time jobs / gigs, but which MAY not necessarily be done repeatedly by the same user, and on these occasions, the rewards are usually too low to make it worth the effort and competition.
A solution for this "top-heavy" situation could be changing the way rewards are shared: let users share staking rewards ALSO after the selection procces has ended, but (1/2) 1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
